Specializing in the production of LED chip, LED lamp beads
PESD1CAN electrostatic protection SOT23-3 24V two-way
Modern SK hynix eMMC 8G industrial grade H26M31001HPR
Zgar International (M) SDN BHD , https://www.zgarvape.com
Skip to content
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sina Technology News - February 17, Evening Edition. A recent article by a well-known tech commentator titled *"Is Yang Yuanqing a Qualified Lenovo CEO?"* has sparked heated discussions across the industry. The writer, known as "Late Universe," faced a legal response from Lenovo after publishing an in-depth analysis questioning the leadership and performance of the company's CEO.
The article, which was divided into six sections, explored various aspects including Yang Yuanqing's tenure, business performance, investment potential, merger strategies, salary structure, and team leadership. It aimed to assess whether Yang was fit for his role at the helm of one of China’s most prominent tech companies.
The controversy quickly escalated online, prompting the commentator to release a statement today. According to him, he received a formal letter from Zhong Lun Law Firm on behalf of Lenovo Group, demanding that he cease the "infringement" and issue an apology. The letter accused him of fabricating financial data and making false claims against both the company and its CEO.
In response, the writer emphasized that he did not intend to defame or harm Lenovo's reputation. He clarified that while there was a minor error in the article (misrepresenting Hong Kong dollars as US dollars), there was no intentional misinformation. He also mentioned that he had already issued a correction and an apology.
He expressed openness to further dialogue with Yang Yuanqing, suggesting a face-to-face meeting or the possibility of publishing a signed article from the CEO. He stressed that "Business People" would continue to report objectively and fairly on Lenovo and its leadership, while remaining committed to legal accountability.
This incident highlights the growing tension between media scrutiny and corporate responses in the tech sector, raising questions about freedom of expression and the role of independent journalism in shaping public perception.